‘The greatest rivalry’ can be hard to define. In New Zealand, the Crusaders have been top dog for so long their rivals have often looked like drifters, just passing through a town with permanent red and black bunting. Crusaders versus Blues should be big city versus the gateway to the country, but all too often Auckland has failed to live up to the billing. Crusaders versus Hurricanes represents the battle between the two major cities in New Zealand, one in the South Island, the other in the North.
But if the measure is the intensity and closeness of the contest, the truest rivalry in recent times is to be found in the duel between the Crusaders and the Chiefs. Over the past 50 games between the clubs, the Crusaders have won on 28 occasions, and the Chiefs on 22. The last major final between the pair was the Super Rugby Pacific 2023 showpiece, shaded by the Saders, 25-20.
The Chiefs have won three of the four matches since then, and last weekend in Christchurch it was a battle between the number one and two in the competition as a whole. You cannot ask for a better rivalry than that. Think Joe Frazier against Muhammad Ali at the ‘Thrilla in Manila’ in 1975, or Tom Watson versus Jack Nicklaus starring in their very own ‘Duel in the Sun’ at the Open Championship in Turnberry two years later.
The Crusaders against the Chiefs had more than a taste of the same brutal, beautiful give-and-take symmetry about it. After trailing 19-3 just before half-time, the Chiefs came roaring back to score the next 32 points and win by 35-19. The tale of the tape in the second half was 25-0 to Clayton McMillan’s men, and they have made it a habit to be stronger at the finish than they are at the start of games this season.
What is the overall statistical picture? Look at the following figures, up to and including round 12 of the tournament.
Among the New Zealand-based franchises, only Moana Pasifika can compete in terms of pure second-half scoring, but after their second-half blitz at the quaintly named Apollo Projects Stadium, the Chiefs had overtaken the Pasifika comeback kings, who were on a bye in round 13. Their total of 234 points scored, with a massive points differential of +91 in the period after oranges, dwarfs all rivals.
The point was not lost on Crusaders head coach Rob Penney afterwards.
“It was a bit of a lesson, how we respond now will be critical,” he said.
“How they were able to go through us – particularly at the back end [of the game]. They were pretty ruthless, and we weren’t able to counter it.
“We were just a little bit below where we needed to be. We were still making too many tackles [a grand total of 209].
“They are notorious for going hard after halftime – we expected it but weren’t able to combat it.”
We live in a rugby era when the way you finish is more important than the way you start. Since Rassie Erasmus first experimented with the 7/1 forwards/backs bench split for the Springboks in mid-2023, more and more top teams have taken up the torch, with France winning this year’s Six Nations on the back of the 7/1, and second-placed England finishing with a demolition of Wales in Cardiff featuring back-rower Ben Earl playing in their midfield.
While McMillan has largely stuck by the more traditional 5/3 split, he went heavy with his tight forwards on the pine for the crucial encounter in Christchurch. The five included three full All Blacks in Samisoni Taukei’aho, Josh Lord and Samipeni Finau, and another would-be Wallaby in prop Aidan Ross.

Whether you go for the full forward overhaul a la Rassie and Fabien Galthié around the 50-minute mark, or McMillan’s partial revamp, you need to ensure you have the right mix of forwards who can go the full 80-minute distance without losing effectiveness – to wit Luke Jacobsen and Wallace Sititi – and those who can bring undeniable physical impact off the bench.
When you get it right, it will give you priceless control of the contact zone. The Chiefs forced their hosts to make a colossal 209 tackles, and the home side conceded eight of the nine penalties that referee Ben O’Keefe awarded at the ruck. They were all in defence, for offences as various as not rolling away from the tackle zone, illegal use of the hands and failure to release the ball-carrier. Midway through the second period, O’Keefe had become so exasperated he issued a general warning for repeated red and black indiscretions in the same area.
Two forwards who epitomised the Chiefs’ control of the collision zone and the ruck following the carry were one starter – number eight Sititi – and one finisher, in the shape of mountainous replacement hooker Taukei’aho.
Sititi led all forward runners on either side with an enormous 22 carries for 130m and two tackle busts, while featuring on 12 occasions at first receiver to take the pressure off Damian McKenzie. Meanwhile Taukei’aho thoroughly enjoyed his five carries for 40m in only 19 minutes of ball-in-play time, two more tackle busts and 100% gainline success. He also hit on two other perfect scores, with five out of five successful lineout throws and six tackles completed with no misses.
McMillan backed up Penney’s comments after the match: “We rolled up the sleeves and just went through the front [door]. We were patient enough to wait for the opportunity, I think this was Chiefs rugby at its best. ”
The seminal sequence of play arrived in the 72nd minute, with Chiefs scrum-half Cortez Ratima feeding an attacking scrum near halfway. They went through 18 phases in just under two minutes before Sititi grounded the ball over the try line. By the end of it the Crusaders looked utterly dazed and confused, as if they had been tossed out of a combine harvester like chaff, such was their opponents’ control of the contact zone.
The visitors built power upon power upon power, with carries by Sititi leading straight into runs by Taukei’aho and their main power-carrying back, 12 Quinn Tupaea.
Nothing fancy, no last-gasp in-passes or tip-ons; just hard carries with two men in close support obliterating all resistance fore and aft. For most of the time, the Chiefs had 12 or even 13 men visible in the screenshot ‘box’.
First, Jacobson and Emoni Narawa, followed by another rumbustious, hard-shouldered carry by Taukei’aho – a big right-hand following the two jabs. Then Sititi, tagging along behind. Never more than one pass off nine, focus on clean-out not pass or, heaven forbid, the spectre of an offload.
It is fittingly none other than Sititi who plants the ball over the Crusaders line to score within a sequence when he carried the ball four times in 18 phases, with Taukei’aho contributing two big runs and three cleanouts of his own.
The greatest rivalry in New Zealand rugby over recent years has unquestionably featured the Crusaders in one corner and the Chiefs in the other. It may yet prove to be so once again in the grand final of Super Rugby Pacific 2025, because right now, the two clubs are the best the competition has to offer.
All Blacks supremo ‘Razor’ Robertson would do well to take a leaf out of McMillan’s playbook, and in particular his emphasis on the bench and the second half of games – an area in which the national team struggled in Razor’s rookie season. Two of McMillan’s charges who should emphatically make the cut are Sititi and Taukei’aho. One is a proper 80-minute man with a huge engine, the other is the very definition of the phrase ‘impact player’.
The Chiefs and Crusaders may never walk off the 18th green arm-in-arm in the evening sunshine, as Nicklaus and Watson once did 48 years distant, but together they can restore the pride of New Zealand rugby in a new era.
As the telly commentary on ‘The Duel in the Sun’ reminded: “Does it seem old-fashioned, or sentimental to conclude that this was one man’s title but two men’s championship? And that one complemented and motivated the other? And that to a venerable championship, now hugely professional in the commercial age, they brought a shared respect and dignity that is more to their credit, so great is the reward. They did all those things.”
I was working with the game on in the background at 19-3. Had to run it back and watch properly when I saw the final score. Hard to know who could combat that efficiency
Having trouble keeping up, Nick, another article hot on the heels….great stuff. Actually writing this morning in “enemy territory”, NSW. Little place, Brunswick Heads, looking out over a tidal little bit of river towards some nice dense bushland, with the dulled roar of the surf coming from half a km away.
That was one impressive performance from the Chiefs on the weekend. Thought the Crusaders were gong to run over them at first. ‘Twas a brutal game too !
“in the shape of mountainous replacement hooker Taukei’aho.” He is big indeed. I saw him close up in Bne. last year when the Reds rolled the Chiefs, and thought he did not look that big, but he is at 120 kgs and 1.83 m. Had a look at rival hookers. Codie Taylor as tall, but 108 kgs. Malcolm Marx taller at 1.86 m, 116 kgs. Dan Sheehan 1.91 m only 111 kgs.
Richie Asiata I see is also big at 120 kgs, but not as tall at 1.80 m. He is worth watching, Nick, I feel he must be in contention now for a WB squad place. I read in another comment last week he is the heaviest hooker to Au. Super rugby.
Packed a few in before another break Miz!
Yes heavy hookers. I like em. I think BPA has lot a bit of weight [nudge from Joe?] but has always played at around 120k’s.
They may look to redesignate one of those Reds hookers to anothe franchise at season’s end, what with Asiata, Nasser and Faessler all there.
Thanks for a very enjoyable article. Coincidentally there are a few similarities to one I broke the back of last night on how teams have made 6/2 and 7/1 benches work and how the ABs might go about combatting them. Hopefully out this week or next.
One point I make is that they are only worthwhile if the replacement is just about as good as the starter. I’ll add Vaa’i to the two you mentioned as being 80 minute men who are two classes above anyone else the Chiefs have available in their positions. This might explain the move to the 5/3 bench - this is Sititi’s first start. Of course TV got injured and Ah Kuoi had to go the distance last night.
I’m so impressed by the engine already possessed by young Sititi, to put in such a shift despite his lack of match fitness.
Great section about the rivalry, which began early in the 2012 season, Rennie’s first. For years they’d bullied us up front and we were determined to stand up to them and niggle away at every opportunity. They didn’t like it and there’s been a real needle between the teams ever since but that attitude is a big part of why we’ve usually been the most competitive team against them for well over a decade now.
Good plug JD!
Yes Vaai def an 80 minute man. He and Sititi could be the sping of the AB back five for years to come.
The content in the rivalry really showed in that second half, when it was the Chiefs who did the bullying! You do not often see a Crusaders’ side done like that.
Looked like there was a deceptively strong wind in Chch…Chiefs chose to keep the ball in hand during first half and make the Crusaders tackle their hearts out/scramble. Chiefs then utilised the wind well in 2nd to throw different shapes at them.
Problem for Chiefs and their ball in hand style is it creates opportunities for the opposition when they get it wrong…Waratahs game a prime example with their 100m try.
Chiefs have some enviable depth in their forwards this year…although offset in the backs with ALB, Poihipi, ENS, Trask and Coombe-Fabling all out of action. Wonder if that’s what drove the 6-2 bench split for those 2 weeks.
I think there can be risks with any kind of game, but less so with that poweer game you see in the second half try - play is all close to ruck and nearly all off 9. Impressive stuff.
Yes they started 5-3 and went to 6-2 more recently, I think they have a better record with 5-3 though!
Well done to your Chiefs team. It was a deceptively strong wind.
Thanks NB. I thought the Chiefs were not up to standard in the 1st half with wrong decisions and bad handling. However what was key was the Crusaders scrum never won a penalty leading to an easy touch line finder for a drive. The Crusaders lost their true attacking threat in Will Jordan as well. Chiefs lifted and Crusaders couldn't stay with them.
“The Crusaders lost their true attacking threat in Will Jordan”. Agree, OM. He is key to their potency, and probably to the AB’s, esp. in tight games. He is just so elusive, such a lethal finisher…not ofc in the second half replacement sense.
Great point on the scrum OM. Not sure whether it was you I was chatting to on another site, but on reflection I think that Ollie Norris and George Dyer have really come of age this season. First time we've had a solid scrum for a few years.
The SRP refs have done a good job of keeping scrum pens to a bare minimum, esp with those that have been constantly on the move - and there was a lot of movement in that game in C’church. Good for officiating to deny those cheap 22m entries!
The Crusaders did lose their best attacking back in Will Jordan and I also think this year has shown he is the Crusaders most astute rugby thinker. He was always a great attacker, but he has stepped up in the leadership role. I am backing Johnny McNicoll to go well in the interim until Will is back.
I loved that sequence of play in how the Chiefs manipulated the Crusaders defence by going from the middle of the field to the right edge, and then swung it back to the left side with brutal carrying and rucking.
That whole playbook was how the Blues won the competition last year with a French-style and how teams like France and South Africa pound opponents into submission. So I am glad that another NZ team has taken this approach on board.
DMac’s try early in the 2nd half was kind of similar - they attracted the defence into going towards the right side, only for DMac to swing back to the left and score untouched.
The Chiefs major problems are their inconsistency and discipline. Last week against the Hurricanes (and previously against the Waratahs) show that if they drop the ball and give away stupid penalties, anyone can beat them. DMac needs to learn how to dig them out of big holes like that.
Yep I think a lot of coaches ‘listened’ to how Vern Cotter achieved his outcomes last year and have incorporated some of that thinking into their own games. Chiefs still looke the best in comp from what I’ve seen.
DMac wasnt playing in the Canes loss..so I woukd have thought it would have been quite difficult for him to have dug them out of that hole.